Decorated ApparelCustomer story

Causal Intelligence helps Decorated Apparel Manufacturer to Cut Defects by 50%

50%
Defect rate cut
1 in 4
Inspection labor needed
2
Variables nobody was measuring
0
Changes to the production line

You already catch the defect. That was never the problem.

Picture this. Cameras run on your machines and every flaw gets logged: what it was, which machine, what time. Every bad part gets pulled. Ordinary inspection work, and exactly what you asked for.

But the defect rate goes on doing whatever it was going to do.

Inspection tells you what happened. It never tells you why. The cause is usually not visible from the line at all: it sits in a variable nobody is measuring, moving on its own schedule, and no amount of looking harder at the product will surface it. So you staff up against a symptom and never once touch what is causing it.

It is hot out, the machines are going to be acting up today. Every floor has a dozen beliefs like that. They are never written down, and nobody has ever tested one.

So you turn to Shelfmark, and we treat it as a hypothesis.

Temperature and humidity sensors go in around your machines and run alongside the defect log until there is enough of each to test the thing properly. The correlation holds. Defect rates track the conditions inside the building, and those conditions track the weather outside it. Moisture is walking into the plant and showing up in the product.

Avg Daily Humidity vs Defect Rate
Humidity (%)Defect rate (%)
304050607080Humidity (%)0246810Defect rate (%)3 Jun4 Jun5 Jun6 Jun7 Jun8 Jun9 Jun10 Jun
Move your cursor across the chart to watch the defect rate follow the 8 Jun humidity spike.
Defect rate plotted against conditions on the floor. The shape of this chart is the whole argument.

Now the defect rate is half what it was, and nothing on the line changed.

We bring the model back as an argument rather than an observation: here is what these conditions are costing you, and here is roughly what it would take to keep them out. You make a change to the building. No new press, no new recipe, nothing on the line touched, and the defect rate falls by half. Inspection labor goes from roughly one person per machine to one per four.

We do not control your climate and we do not drive your machines. We find the variable, prove it against production data from your own floor, and put the cost of it in terms you can carry to whoever signs. The decision stays with your people. What changed is what they know.

Do that across enough lines and the useful output stops being an alert and starts being a forecast: these conditions, on this machine, tend to produce this defect, and they are building right now.

Technical summary

The manufacturer installed AI visual inspection, then correlated its defect data with IoT environmental sensor data to build a model that predicts defects before the line makes them.

Anyone can tell you a part is bad. We want to tell you what is about to go wrong.

Talk to a
Shelfmark expert.

See if it’s a fit.
In 30 minutes you’ll know whether we can catch your defects, on your substrate, and your line speed.
See what’s possible.
We can show you the real thing. A line with every defect caught automatically; fewer escapes, less rework, and capacity you didn’t know you had.
See if we are full of shit.
We are a young company doing things that have never been done before. We own that, and we will answer any questions you have.